J Korean Med Assoc Search

CLOSE


J Korean Med Assoc > Volume 54(8); 2011 > Article
Kim, Jhang, Kang, Koh, Kim, Park, and Park: Healthy cities approach as a new paradigm of public health policy

Abstract

The healthy cities approach emphasizes the role of the leadership of local governments in promoting the health of the population in city settings. The concept emerged from public health strategies declared in the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, and reflects the characteristics of the third public health revolution. The Korean healthy cities movement, characterized by voluntary participation of local governments in the Alliance for Healthy Cities, has grown rapidly in recent years. A strong push of the healthy cities movement by a local government without a profound commitment to the vision may hinder the effective and sustainable development of the movement. By reviewing the historical background and significance of the healthy cities movement and its underlying concepts, and illustrating the main strategies and goals of the movement, that is, the development of partnerships, community participation and empowerment, and working in networks for stimulating change, this article argues that the healthy cities movement is a potent vehicle for implementing the new paradigm of public health introduced to local governments. We also argue that the Korean healthy cities movement needs more active participants and more support of the central government and other related stakeholders.

References

1. Baum FE. Healthy Cities and change: social movement or bureaucratic tool? Health Promot Int 1993;8:31-40.

2. de Leeuw E, Skovgaard T. Utility-driven evidence for healthy cities: problems with evidence generation and application. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:1331-1341.

3. Kim JH. Review for open discussions about health cities program. Health Soc Sci 2007;21:137-156.

4. Kim Y. Healthy cities, healthy communities. J Korean Plann Assoc 2007;42(1):5-6.

5. Nam EW. Review and prospective of the healthy cities in Korea. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot 2007;24(2):123-134.

6. Nam EW, Shin T, Song YL, Park JS, Park KS, Song TM, Kim MK. Building web database for WHO healthy city Wonju. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot 2007;24(3):119-128.

7. Kim JM, Koh KW. Assessment of individual, organizational, envirommental capacity for healthy cities. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot 2009;26(2):119-133.

8. Jung GH, Kim KY, Na BJ. The characteristics of healthy city project in Korea. J Agric Med Community Health 2009;34:155-167.

9. Omran AR. The epidemiologic transition: a theory of the epidemiology of population change. 1971. Milbank Q 2005;83:731-757.

10. Olshansky SJ, Ault AB. The fourth stage of the epidemiologic transition: the age of delayed degenerative diseases. Milbank Q 1986;64:355-391.

11. Brown TM, Cueto M, Fee E. The World Health Organization and the transition from "international" to "global" public health. Am J Public Health 2006;96:62-72.

12. Breslow L. From disease prevention to health promotion. JAMA 1999;281:1030-1033.

13. Potvin L, McQueen D. In: McQueen DV, Kickbusch I, Potvin L, Pelikan JM, Balbo J, Abel T, editor. Modernity, public health, and health promotion: a reflexive discourse. Health and modernity: the role of theory in health promotion 2007;New York: Springer. 12-20.

14. Dempsey C, Battel-Kirk B, Barry MM. The CompHP core competencies framework for health promotion handbook 2011;Galway: Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC), National University of Ireland Galway.

15. Kickbusch I. The contribution of the World Health Organization to a new public health and health promotion. Am J Public Health 2003;93:383-388.

16. Hancock T, Duhl L. WHO Healthy Cities Papers, No. 1. Promoting health in an urban context 1988;Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

17. Lawrence RJ. In: Galea S, Vlahov D, editor. Building healthy cities: the World Health Organization perspective. Handbook of urban health: population, methods and practice 2005;New York: Springer. 479-502.

18. de Leeuw E. Evidence for Healthy Cities: reflections on practice, method and theory. Health Promot Int 2009;24:Suppl 1. i19-i36.

19. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Twenty steps for developing a Healthy Cities Project 1997;3rd ed. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

20. Green G. Health and governance in European cities: a compendium of trends and responsibilities for public health in 46 member states of the WHO European Region 1998;Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

21. Green G, Price C, Lipp A, Priestley R. Partnership structures in the WHO European Healthy Cities project. Health Promot Int 2009;24:Suppl 1. i37-i44.

22. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Community participation in local health and sustainable development: approaches and techniques 2002;Copenhagen: Centre for Urban Health, WHO Regional Office for Europe.

23. Brager G, Specht H. Community organizing 1973;New York: Columbia University.

24. Davidson S. Spinning the wheel of empowerment. Planning 1998;1262:14-15.

25. Heritage Z, Dooris M. Community participation and empowerment in Healthy Cities. Health Promot Int 2009;24:Suppl 1. i45-i55.

26. Capello R. The city network paradigm: measuring urban network externalities. Urban Stud 2000;37:1925-1945.

27. Tsouros A. City leadership for health and sustainable development: the World Health Organization European Healthy Cities Network. Health Promot Int 2009;24:Suppl 1. i4-i10.

28. Lafond J, Heritage Z, Tsouros A, Farrington J. National healthy cities networks: a powerful force for health and sustainable development in Europe 2003;Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

29. Janss Lafond L, Heritage Z. National networks of Healthy Cities in Europe. Health Promot Int 2009;24:Suppl 1. i100-i107.

30. Eriksson C. Learning and knowledge-production for public health: a review of approaches to evidence-based public health. Scand J Public Health 2000;28:298-308.

31. Birckmayer JD, Weiss CH. Theory-based evaluation in practice. What do we learn? Eval Rev 2000;24:407-431.

32. O'Neill M, Simard P. Choosing indicators to evaluate Healthy Cities projects: a political task? Health Promot Int 2006;21:145-152.

33. Curtice L, Springett J, Kennedy A. Evaluation in urban settings: the challenge of Healthy Cities. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser 2001;92):309-334.

34. Dooris M. Healthy settings: challenges to generating evidence of effectiveness. Health Promot Int 2006;21:55-65.

Figure 1
Healthy Cities meta-theory. Adapted from de Leeuw [19] with permission from Oxford University Press.
jkma-54-884-g001-l.jpg
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 5 Crossref
  • 2 Scopus
  • 1,506 View
  • 10 Download
Related articles in
J Korean Med Assoc


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

ARCHIVES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
37 Ichon-ro 46-gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul
Tel: +82-2-6350-6562    Fax: +82-2-792-5208    E-mail: jkmamaster@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Medical Association.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next